The Colorado Department of State warned that it would be “a matter for the Courts” if the state’s Republican party withdrew from or ignored the results of the primary.

  • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Honestly I’m of two minds about it.

    One, faith by the electorate in the process of elections is part of democracy. I genuinely don’t think it’s reasonable to tell 60 million Trump supporters that those of them that live in Colorado aren’t allowed to vote for the man. I get that the letter of the law is that he tried to invade the congress and kill the vice president to keep himself in power, which is a crime that in any civilized society would keep him off the ballot not to mention behind bars, but this is actually a rare instance where I think “but they’ll get really mad about it” is a viable reason not to do it. Or, at least do it on a national level, since the idea of an election where certain candidates are or aren’t on the ballot differently in different states is obviously undemocratic and will clearly lead to retaliation in kind by the GOP which will step us a little further towards a civil war.

    Two, fuck it. They’re already rogue. They tried to kill the vice president. We’re in a fight for the survival of democracy in this country and it’s nice to see the boundaries being pushed by the people who aren’t the ones kicking out the supporting timbers.

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Fuck 'em. The only thing they don’t get mad about is fascism winning. A majority of Republicans already believe elections in this country are illegitimate simply because their orange messiah didn’t win. We’re past the point of sitting down and having a reasonable conversation.

      • aelwero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’d argue commentary like yours is a greater hindrance to a reasonable conversation than the republicans are. You’re capable of being rational but are willingly refusing to.

        And queue the Dems throwing down votes at a someone paying them a compliment and ironically proving my point…

        • mondo_brondo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Every time I see/hear someone say this, I am reminded of the phrase, “You cannot reason someone out of a position they were not reasoned into”. It also doesn’t help that the republicans in power have shown us, over and over, that they are not acting/arguing in good faith.

          Having a reasonable conversation and trying to remain rational when faced with those two factors is very difficult, at best, and puts you at a significant disadvantage, at worst.

          That being said, I don’t really have any better ideas other than to stick to my ideals and try to be rational/reasonable.

          • aelwero@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            My comment had almost exactly nothing to do with republicans… I implied they aren’t capable of being reasonable/rational, but the point was really about Dems, and their lack of being reasonable/rational not because they can’t, but because they just decide not to.

            …and I got the downvotes… Didn’t sound like a Democrat, so I must be a repub, because that’s just how Dems work now.

            You seem uncharacteristically reasonable though, so I replied to you just to say that :)