The same question was archived on r/trackers. Would like to get notified when a compatible tracker is available for testing, it’s not even clear if there is an implementation just yet.

The specs are here since 2017 https://www.bittorrent.org/beps/bep_0052.html
Compatible clients are available, at least qBittorrent (from v4.4.0) and BiglyBT.

    • uyuu@lemmy.4d2.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      All site admins would need to do is increase the torrent hash length in the tracker, if it is a new tracker site. I actually recommended to use bittorrent v2 to the fappaizuri guys when they started it. The response was: Well, it works with v1 as well, soo ¯\(ツ)

  • navigatron@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t speak to current state; but with any luck we are approaching / entering the post-tracker era. DHT handles the actual “tracking”, and other components are (very slowly) coming out to handle search and reputation.

    • pedroapero@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Restored security (SHA-256) is the first reason.

      But what’s most interesting to me is the single files hashes.
      Each individual file will get it’s own hash, reachable from the DHT. It also seems that there will be some kind of standard hashing method allowing to get unique reproducible hashes (no more piece size or parameters). Two persons would always obtain the same hash for the same file even for different torrents. This is all to reduce swarm fragmentation.
      So it would be similar to IPFS (except this one broke his promises by introducing several multihash versions…).