I've always felt guilty by taking for granted the rare breed of virtuous humans that provide free excellent software without relying on advertising. Let's change that and pay, how much would I “lose” anyway?

I’ve always felt guilty by taking for granted the rare breed of virtuous humans that provide free excellent software without relying on advertising. Let’s change that and pay, how much would I “lose” anyway?

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    672·
    9 months ago

    The real outrage is big tech clouds like amazon taking open source software for free and bundling it up in AWS services that cost a lot of money.

    If they would contribute back to the authors, they would become rich, but of course not…

      • huginn@feddit.it
        9·
        9 months ago

        Yeah the software being bundled in default images is just a convenience.

        Most places that are serious about using AWS will be shipping their own images anyway

      • pup_atlas@pawb.social
        83·
        9 months ago

        If that were solely true, there would be a lot more competition in the field right now. Amazon, (and to a much lesser extent the other 2 big names, GCP and Azure) are so massive not because they have a lot of power (plenty of other companies like digital ocean or OVM have plenty of scaling power too)— but because the integrations between their products are so seamless. Most of that functionality has a foundation in FOSS software that they’ve built on top of.

        • tired_of_sinophobia@lemmygrad.ml
          3·
          9 months ago

          the integrations between their products are so seamless

          You’re joking, right?

          The actual reasons why orgs choose cloud is usually 1. Decision maker got sweet talked (interpret that however you want) by a cloud sales rep 2. Shift capex to opex and/or 3. Shift liability risk. (Bonus pt: decisionmaker needed cloud in his resume before jumping ship and moving on to their next bigger gig)

          If you think third party services are being chosen for tech reasons alone you clearly don’t have experience in the sector.

          I hate people exploiting the open source community but this is not the battle we need to be fighting when it comes to cloud. (Privacy and security would be a better angle.)

          Source: IT worker for almost 2 decades now

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        9 months ago

        Which, by itself, is fine. But their contributions to open source are very one-handed and pale in comparison to how much they benefit out of it.

        Hell, my company is no different. They allocate one day out of the year as “open source day” where devs can contribute back to open source projects on company time. But it must be something we already use.

        No personal development. No non-essential libraries.

        We make literally millions off of these libraries and we don’t even contribute monetarily.

        If these companies gave even 0.01% of their revenue to these essential libraries, they’d never even have to ask for money.

      • kool_newt@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        True, but AWS and the cloud in general likely would’ve never evolved without top notch free software, i.e. Linux, because the cost would’ve been prohibitive. I am on a team that runs a small public cloud and there are many systems needed to support the cloud, it’s not just the instances/VMs.

      • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
        1·
        9 months ago

        I think their point (may be wrong) is that none of this high powered software would exist without the goodness of strangers. Tbf it probably wouldn’t look like this without business / on the clock contributing either

    • 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍@lemmy.ml
      4·
      9 months ago

      it’s not only clouds, everyone uses open source and like whole secure WWW etc. is using openssl, every site uses some kind of open source js library, should they all go proprietary because they don’t pay?