• TheRevenger@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You have the right not to be denied food or shelter… Are you saying everyone should receive free food and shelter? How will that work? I understand small scale communes can mostly work under that idea, but a country with millions of people? Scarcity is the basis of economic theory for a reason.

    • relevants@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Currently, as much as 40% of food is thrown away in the US, while millions of people experience food insecurity. The scarcity is fully intentional.

      • gun/linux@latte.isnot.coffee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is that food thrown away? You do realise that food can get thrown away for being bad? That at least takes up 10 percentage points, then there’s the question on how its measured. Who is throwing this food away? If its your average Joe then I doubt their throwing it away just to make artificial scarcity. How nutritional is the food that gets thrown away?

        millions of people experience food insecurity.

        The US has hundreds of millions of people those people experiencing food insecurity barely make up anything. Also would that food that gets thrown away even feed everyone?

        • relevants@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          those people experiencing food insecurity barely make up anything

          Then it should be easy to feed them with just a fraction of the food that’s thrown away?? How you could possibly say that and think it helps your point is beyond me.

          • gun/linux@latte.isnot.coffee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I said that because the person I was replying to was making it seem like millions of people was everyone and their mother, the truth is if they wanted artificial scarcity they would do it to more people

            • relevants@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah got it, millions of people suffering is not a lot, so it must not be a real issue. You’re the worst kind of person.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Capitalism creates scarcity to generate profit. We live and have been living in a time of unprecedented efficiency productivity and abundance. Artifical scarcity is used to keep workers from resisting wage slavery.

      • gun/linux@latte.isnot.coffee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Companies would rather sell more product then pretend for it to be rarer (except for stuff like diamonds but those are selled to rich, successful people anyway)

        • Miqo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s such a naïve thing to say. Artificial scarcity is incredibly common and used as a marketing tool by nearly every industry. My favorite example is when digital content has “limited edition” copies.

        • Viclan@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Literally what are you talking about??? Why would a company not enforce artificial scarcity, it means they have to produce less and their product is more valuable per item. It costs companies to produce more product, they’re not interested in selling a good product just anything that will keep profit margins high. If anything they’d lay off the actual laborers to keep their executives nice and comfy while “cutting costs” across the board. Why do we subsidize farmers to overproduce and we still have people suffering food insecurity?