d_k_bo@feddit.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agojpeg-xl-meme.webpfeddit.deimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1380arrow-down118
arrow-up1362arrow-down1imagejpeg-xl-meme.webpfeddit.ded_k_bo@feddit.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoFek google and its avif. JPEG XL is much efficient
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoJPEG-XL is open and free aswell! I am talking about efficiency. It takes much less space for the same image with no quality loss
minus-squareryannathans@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI am not sure that claim is entirely correct, do you have testing to share against avif? I haven’t found anything to come out on top of avif, my whole library is avif now so I have done a lot of testing and encoding
You mean AVIF?
Fek google and its avif. JPEG XL is much efficient
Avif is av1 based, open and free.
JPEG-XL is open and free aswell! I am talking about efficiency. It takes much less space for the same image with no quality loss
I am not sure that claim is entirely correct, do you have testing to share against avif? I haven’t found anything to come out on top of avif, my whole library is avif now so I have done a lot of testing and encoding