• Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not really. It’s mainly about gaining market dominance on a technology they think is the future. They’ll build them right next to the massive coal plant alongside a million other things they’re subsidizing.

    • blazera@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Even if its not some altruistic reasons, they still are literally subsidizing this emissions reducing technology.

      Tho they are also going pretty ham on subsidizing renewable energy too.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        You won’t be saying that once the market crashes. You’ll realize that there are much better ways of spending that money. Like far more practical emissions reducing solutions.

        • blazera@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          How do subsidies=crash, and what are more effective emissions reductions solutions than renewable energy and electrifying transit?

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re better off spending it on stuff like mass transit and the like. It won’t just all disappear at some point in the future.