• SacrificedBeans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m sure there’s some loophole there, maybe between countries’ laws. And if there isn’t, Hey! We’ll make one!

      • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I really find this a bit alarmist and exaggerated. Consider the motive and the alternative. You really think companies like that have any other options than to deal with those things?

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Isn’t CSAM classed as images and videos which depict child sexual abuse? Last time I checked written descriptions alone did not count, unless they were being forced to look at AI generated image prompts of such acts?

        • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          That month, Sama began pilot work for a separate project for OpenAI: collecting sexual and violent images—some of them illegal under U.S. law—to deliver to OpenAI. The work of labeling images appears to be unrelated to ChatGPT.

          This is the quote in question. They’re talking about images