• andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a Linux/Android guy historically and I have to say I really love the stance Apple takes on privacy versus Google’s more, uh, laxe privacy stance. Knowing my phone OS that I carry everywhere with me wasn’t designed by a company selling my data would be a significant plus and has had me rethinking things lately. A lot more than, say, whether I prefer the UI or customizability or the camera suite.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes I’m conflicted. I don’t like the tracking Google does but I do love how Android has so much more FOSS apps.

    • LukeMedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would switch to iphone myself if it wasn’t for sideloading, and ublock origin in Firefox.

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      What makes you think apple doesn’t harvest your data for pretty much the same purposes as Google?

      • weedwhacking@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because apples goal is to sell you hardware. Privacy sells hardware. Googles goal is to have manufacturers use their OS for free so they can harvest and sell data, and maintain control of the mobile ad space.

        I’m not saying Apple is a moral company far from it, but it has business incentive to build with privacy at the core, Google has the opposite.

        • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem is Apple won’t be able to just rely on that forever. Eventually when Macbook Airs are starting at $2999 and people can’t afford their hardware, they’ll start cutting into user data more if they haven’t reached that point yet. Just because a business model supports a virtue doesn’t mean that company will always abide by their previous moral commitments. Google once said “Don’t be evil”

          • mark3748@geddit.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, the THREE-trillion dollar, 50-year-old company that figuratively just prints money is going to become so desperate that they will abandon their extremely profitable business model to become… an ad agency?

            The absolutely irrelevant reference to a vague PR line in Googles old corporate code of conduct was a nice touch, though

            • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, that’s what’s going to happen, but maybe not for an ads platform. Your rights are on the chopping block, but don’t worry though, because by that point you’ll be convinced that giving up your privacy and any individual thought is entirely within your self interest. Ideas like “Big company, much value, can’t possibly want more money” is pretty much halfway down the line.

              Great work doing their work to convince yourself, for them.

      • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They’re a computer company. Their primary revenue streams are from hardware, software, and services, not from selling ads.

        • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apple is a corporation that has no ideals or principles, by design. They only care about profit at any cost, and currently support a level of privacy they are comfortable with, because their analysts have surmised that supporting this level of privacy gives a net positive of consumer goodwill over lost ad revenue. Once it gets to a point where that inequality flips over to show a profit in selling user data, that’s exactly what they’re going to do. Sure, they’re not going to reverse directions, right away, no. They have an army of extremely well paid, entirely unscrupulous behavioural psychologists and consumer trend analysts whose job it is to convince you that you want whatever it is that the company wants.

          All the corporation ass-kissing just makes me sick. It’s like being a sheep in a herd all collectively moving to the edge of a cliff with no power for any individual to change course.

    • CharlestonChewbacca@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      As someone who works in Cybersecurity, I read a lot of security reports. I haven’t seen an iPhone be the most private/secure phone in about half a decade.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not a binary issue. Google’s entire business model is dependent on it. Apple’s is not, so they don’t do it nearly to the same extent.

        • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That doesn’t mean we have to conclude apple is the good guy.

          They can both be shitty corporations. This assignment is not graded on curve.