• Spedwell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think you’re assuming we’re discussing regulating deep fakes (the software), when really everyone is talking about regulating deep fakes (, the use of).

    • Spedwell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      … This is to say, making it illegal to generate life-like images and videos of celebrities, non-celebrities, and political figures without consent is in no way this doomsday scenario you say.

      Defamation and libel are illegal. You can use open-source tools to perform defamation and libel, or you can use those same tools in a way that doesn’t constitute defamation and libel.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Part of the confusion around regulation, at least in the US, is that movie studios such as Disney REALLY want to be able to use deepfakes of celebrities

    • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s foolish to think you can restrict one and not the other, and it’s even more foolish to think our authoritarian governments would do that it they could