No one was inside a Waymo car as it was destroyed.

A crowd destroyed a driverless Waymo car in San Francisco::A Waymo car was destroyed in San Francisco as a crowd began vandalizing it and ultimately set the car on fire. Nobody was in the vehicle at the time.

    • Dra@lemmy.zipEnglish
      27·
      9 months ago

      This question is such a depressing example of Bay-Area inhumanity. God Bless America

    • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      19·
      9 months ago

      Often the RVs in places like OP is referring to are dilapidated and don’t run, with tarps on them, not connected to water or power. Essentially a small shanty house in a slum so I guess it depends on your definition

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      14·
      9 months ago

      Last I checked, RVs are not permanent or semi permanent structures, nor do they have addresses, so… Yes. It’s living in your car, just a bigger car with amenities

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        Which should absolutely NOT be made illegal. Give these people places to actually park their RVs that have facilities to use, instead of pushing more people to end up on the streets.

        Someone should be allowed the freedom to live in an RV if they so choose or can’t afford anything else.

        Just help give them a decent place to do it.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.worldEnglish
      142·
      9 months ago

      The RVs are usually not drivable. The last time they moved them in front of my old job, none of them ran. They had to tow away more than they drove away. I guess you can argue that doesn’t make them totally homeless, but they are definitely creative.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.comEnglish
      11·
      9 months ago

      Homeless doesn’t necessarily mean sleeping under a bridge. You can be crashing at a friend’s place and still be homeless if you don’t have a home of your own to go back to. An illegally parked RV with no mailing address doesn’t count as a home for most purposes.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        But how many of those people would consider themselves homeless? RV shit is a total fucking lifestyle for a lot of people.

        • Misconduct@lemmy.worldEnglish
          9·
          9 months ago

          It’s not a lifestyle if it’s not by choice. Try finding a job without an address. The people that do it as a “lifestyle” are usually just wealthy turds or social media dweebs larping as happy families on the road despite their kids being obviously miserable

          • EdibleFriend@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            9 months ago

            Well… Yeah. That’s why I asked how many of them consider themselves homeless? Obviously some are forced to but then there’s some people who just really fucking like RVs?

            • Misconduct@lemmy.worldEnglish
              4·
              9 months ago

              I would guess that most of them consider themselves homeless. Especially if they’re living in those makeshift tent cities. Either way, they are homeless if they don’t have an address.