• Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Seems weird to call it an “inert nuclear missile” when the entire payload component with the “nuclear” trait was not included.

    For any TL;DR folks: it was just the rocket without the warhead. Basically an empty fuel tank with a nozzle.

  • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    told BBC News on Friday that the device was “just basically a gas tank for rocket fuel”. He called the event “not serious at all”. “In fact, our bomb squad member asked me why we were releasing a news release on a rusted piece of metal,” he said.

    Saved you a click

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I would guess that it was intended as an interceptor weapon. It wouldn’t be used on one plane but a group Bears flying over the Arctic circle.

  • Jode@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t blame the museum for calling the bomb squad. The fuel they put in those things is some real nasty toxic shit that if there were any trace left would be problematic. The whole “nuclear” part is the media being intentionally clickbaity.