• masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Centralised but

    So you are now claiming that centralization isn’t inherently collectivist?

    The property in the Soviet Union belongs to the people albeit managed by the state.

    So you are now claiming nothing in the Soviet Union was nationalized?

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You can be centralised but not collectivist. See the theory of anarcho-capitalism.

      I’m guessing you’re operating from different sensibility of political philosophy. Define collectivism then we can talk.

      • masquenox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        See the theory of anarcho-capitalism.

        I saw it… and just looking at it made it fall apart like an upside-down house of cards in a whirlwind. Strange… this seems to happen every time anyone looks at (so-called) “anarcho-capitalism” a bit too closely. Have you had better luck with it, perhaps?

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Anarcho-capitalism doesn’t work, yes. What’s your point?

          Have you any luck yet trying to answer me how would you define collectivism?