• demesisx@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Do you count the core devs (who maintain/write the core protocol), the foundation (preferably a DAO or voting based organization that is responsible for earmarking the funding for the upgrades and projects for the community), and treasury (that distributes mining/staking rewards and collects the fees for later distribution) as fair distribution? I do (depending on the structure of the aforementioned organizations obviously). Just wondering where you sit on that issue and any of projects that you can point to that have that ideal token allocation you speak of.

    I haven’t found a more fair ITA than Ergo but then again, the Ergo project seems to have trouble paying/attracting really solid core devs other than the founder, Kushti.

    Edit: took out some mention of my favorite project. Want to be impartial here.

    • banghida@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Ideal allocation is 0% foundation, 0% team, 0% VC, 0% anyone. Protocol starts at some date in the future, these are the rules, this is how much will the block reward be. This is how will block reward behave in 5years from now, and this is how it will be in a decade. Mine away, sell on the market for profit. Keep at this for at least a decade. There is no other way to have a fair distribution. Everything else is likely a unregistered security token.

      • demesisx@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Interesting. I like your idealism.

        As a dev myself, it’s a pretty hard sell to get collaborators as it is. I can’t imagine that I’d be able to find ANY if I were to roll my entirely own cryptocurrency with fully realized tokenmonics on consensus algorithm on day one. Sounds like your idea couldn’t possibly be implemented in a staking context as well.

        Do you know of any projects that did it this way (Bitcoin, IMO, doesn’t count since the devs DID end up taking a huge stake in it for themselves)

        • banghida@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          It is hard to justify having yet another cryptocurrency anyways, as you will fall into the same trap everyone fell in post ethereum - running a unregistered security and living afraid of legal consequences. Lying to the community and spending a fortune on lawyers while the VCs who gave you a push end up with any real money.

          It is not my idea anyways, it is something I remember from back in a day. I was interested in the cryptocurrency scene back in 2012, 2013… When things were different. The distribution method I have explained was deployed by Peercoin, the very first proof of stake coin. A brief look shows it is still being distributed in the same fashion and github is active. So clearly there is developer interest.

          • demesisx@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ll sincerely take your example/suggestions to heart moving forward on my own project. I had different ideas about what a fair distribution is and this really turns that on its head. This idea satisfies many of the more egalitarian instincts I have.

            Thank you.

            • banghida@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 months ago

              If you are interested in cryptocurrency perhaps it is worth to cooperate on an established, known to not be illegal security project rather than starting your own.

              • demesisx@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                None of them do what I’m trying to do but thanks for the advice. I’m working on a DApp in the Cardano ecosystem that uses data from an Oracle on Ergo. Not sure if you consider Cardano or Ergo illegal securities but the SEC hasn’t come after them YET.

                • banghida@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I have never heard of ergo but if they had an ICO they probably did start an illegal security. Cardano has all the elements of a security. So it is just a matter of time, SEC is taking it slow. I believe the SEC is trying to set a series of legal precidents to be able to take down the ‘root of all the evil’ - Ethereum. Copycats will easily fall later on.

                  • demesisx@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    9
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I suppose, if it comes to that, nothing is stopping devs like me from hard-forking Cardano’s open source code and launching that fork with a 100% public initial token allocation. I’ve honestly already been considering that option for a while now.

                    Hopefully you’re wrong and it never comes to that… but I’d be ready if it did, for sure.