• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    So if you had 100 cars driving down the highway, and 100 cars idling, the cars not in the traffic jam would emit more smog.

    They emit more, but emit less per mile. Idling means they’re emitting a low level all the time just sitting there for zero miles traveled.

    It could be even worse if it’s not idle, but rather start and stop. Engines emit a lot more when they’re accelerating up, and a lot less while cruising.

    • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Emissions per mile still go down. It is always more efficient per mile to drive at 40 mph than 60 mph, even if it takes longer.

      Idling is negliable compared to the energy lost to air resistance.

      Start-stop is a bit complicated, but it can be eliminated with hybrid vehicles and better trained drivers who understand how to drive in high traffic situations.

      Also, people generally limit their trips by time, not by distance. This is related to induced demand, but if you increase the average car speed on a route, then those cars will just drive farther. If you live in a place with traffic and spend 15 minutes to get to the grocery store, then you’ll only go to grocery stores nearby. If you don’t have traffic, then you might drive the extra 5 miles to get to the cheaper grocery store on the other side of town. So the average engine run time does not go down when you reduce traffic.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Traffic jams don’t go 40mph. They go up to 15mph and then back down to close to zero and back up to 15mph. That’s absolutely horrible for emissions.

        • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Again, hybrid cars are actually more efficient in that kind of traffic than at 40+ mph, and those sorts of traffic waves are usually caused by bad drivers not knowing how to react to road congestion.

          But sure, if people are regularly driving in stop and go traffic in a fully gas car, then I guess the pollution is worse than 40 mph. Adding new lanes would massively increase pollution due to the induced demand. There are more effective and cheaper ways to reduce traffic and pollution than to double the capacity of the road.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            LOL, you ninja edited your post to add that part about start-stop and then acted like it’s my fault for not seeing it.