• Zacryon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Kilonewton? That would be a force and not a mass. For mass the standard unit is (kilo)grams.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      LBS is Imperial Pounds which is a measure of Force and not Mass. That is why your LBS fluctuates based on gravity but your mass doesn’t. So they are correct.

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Weight is a force and it’s not mass. Weight is measured in Newtons.

      • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        We are not talking about the weight force here. We are simply converting pounds-mass to kg. If you dont believe OP meant the mass (whicg Im sure he certainly did) then aks him but when saying something weighs a certain amount then one is usually referring to its mass.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          We were actually talking about Force, though. Pounds is a force, not a mass. I am OP and I meant force because I’m assuming the animal lived on earth. If I wanted to specify mass then I would have used Slugs, the Imperial unit for Mass.

          • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Could you provide any source that states that a pound is a unit of force? Because the American National Standard Institute (here), aswell as Wikipedia and numerous other sources claim its a unit of mass.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The article you linked to does not mention at any point that LBS is a mass, or at all uses the word mass at any point throughout. In fact, it breifly at the end mentions “1 lb=0.45359237 kilogram” as well as “1 Newton=0.224809 pound force” which could indicate a difference between LBF and LBM distinctions.

              It’s commonly understood that you will weigh a different amount of lbs on the moon than on earth. Because it isn’t a mass. It’s a force of gravity.

              There is also evidence in the form of lbs/in^2 being a common measurement, which would be completely nonsense in the context of mass.

              • lightnegative@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I love educational threads like these.

                Even though the original point was “using international standard units makes it clearer for everyone”

              • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Alright, lets look at the US Customary Units and their definitions. Here is the section called “Mass and Weight”. As you can see, everything is defined in metric units of mass. You won’t find even pound-force to be part of the Customary units. I couldn’t find any source saying that pound (not “pound-force”) is a unit of force. However, there was an agreement (I think in 1955) to define the pound in kg.

                it breifly at the end mentions “1 lb=0.45359237 kilogram” as well as “1 Newton=0.224809 pound force”

                That basically implies that lb (pound, imperial unit) is a unit of mass and “pound-force” (non-imperial unit, part of the British Engineering Units) is a unit of force. Thus, pound (on its own) is a unit of mass, right?

                • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  British Engineering Units are not a part of the US-Imperial System, but since I never specified I suppose it’s a good argument.

          • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Did you take into account that earth was heavier millions of years ago? Also, you would have to specify where on earth it weighed that amount.

            Anyway, pound is an imperial unit for mass, just like slug. The “pound-force” is not part of the imperial units, jut rather of the “English Engineering Units” that differentiate between pound-mass, pound-force, pound-foot and others.

            “Pound” is not a unit of force in ANY system. If you really meant force (I doubt that) you should have used lbf. Anyway, noone cares how many Newtons of force the earth exhibited on that animal, all the metric-using people in this thread are interested in its mass. All scales used to weigh something display kg (or pounds), so units of mass.

            • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              The dino would need to be even lighter if the earth was heavier because the force of gravity would be higher, but in general differences in gravity across the earth’s surface amounts to a rounding error. For example, you’re probably looking at 2000 ish miligal from the top of a tall mountain to sea level difference in gravity, or .02m/s^2 difference.

              • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                From mountain to sea level yeah but the difference between Equator and North Pole is almost 1% because Earth is not a perfect sphere.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          No, we don’t refer to mass when weighing something. Measuring mass is quite hard, measuring weight is simple - just use scales.

          • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            In both the British Imperial System and the US Customary Units, a pound is a unit of mass, defined as 0.45359237 kg. In fact, all the definitions in the section “Weights and Masses” of the US Cusomaries are defined in either kg, g or mg.

            • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              A pound is a unit of force, slug is mass. There’s also lbm (pound-mass) which is what I think you’re thinking of, but that’s not the standard

              • HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                A pound is actually not a unit of force. At least not in the US Customary System nor in the British Imperial System. They both are defined as units of mass. Both systems define the standard pound as the “avoirdupois pound”, a unit of mass. The US Customary System doesnt even include a unit of force.

                “Pound-mass” comes from the “English Engineering Units” which differentiates between pounds-mass and pounds-force.

                “Pound” is not a unit of force in any current system. Its the standard unit of mass (slug is also a unit of mass but usually not used). Feel free to provide any source that states that pound is a unit of force.

          • Zacryon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If you use a scale, the force acting upon the mass is calculated out such that you get a mass displayed.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Agree. The error is in the imperial system, there isn’t a difference between weight and mass. The Weight depends on the gravity but the mass not. 240 Pounds Weight on Earth are on the Moon 40 Pounds Weight, but the Mass is still 240 Pound. Because of this in the SI system for the Mass is used kilogramm and for the Weight Newton (old kilopond)

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      But weight is gravitational force not mass. These are deeply related but not the same because us customary is based on pre Newtonian measurement systems

      • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you say that something “weighs” something, that’s a description of mass, not weight, because the wording is from before a time when it was understood that mass and weight are different things.

        All has been said that needs to be said, bloody pedant.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          I was mostly just joking. Of course we use lbs as pseudomass. Fuck, we’ve moved to lbm vs lbf in America because mechanical engineers must be stopped and metricated by force if necessary. We’re a spacefaring species that’s advanced enough to have planetary gravitational maps, of course mass is what we should be using. But also weight as force is just kinda funny to use outside the myriad times you actually need to in engineering

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Specifically LBS is a force, though. Imperial Pounds is not a mass measurement, so converting it would be a better equivalent to Kilonewtons.

      • BluesF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        This has the energy of an 11 year old who just learned what weight is in physics

        • blujan@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Or a middle school physics teacher that barely knows what they’re talking about.