• Elle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I kind of agree about this not entirely fitting science, but I think the survey part is what gives it that little edge to fit here.

    Without reading it in the full context, I’m also not sure what Nozick may have meant with the “want to be a certain way, to be a certain sort of person” idea. I suspect the idea may be that given a fully constructed context, you may be limited to however that context permits you to be instead of an independently actualized/realized person.

    Although if that may be what Nozick was getting at, it’s not without its own problems, much as you highlight with their position supposing existence harboring deeper meaning and significance apart from conscious creations.

    • Endward23@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I suspect the idea may be that given a fully constructed context, you may be limited to however that context permits you to be instead of an independently actualized/realized person.

      Could have some unwanted implication for religious people. Or maybe not. 😉

      To be frank, I cannot make much of this line. This doesn’t preclude some other can make more of it. From the point of view of a reader, it would be great if the writer of this article would put a bite more into this line.

      Although if that may be what Nozick was getting at, it’s not without its own problems, much as you highlight with their position supposing existence harboring deeper meaning and significance apart from conscious creations.

      To make a long story short: I feel agnostic about this questions. At least, to a degree.