• bastion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Their response is not irrational. They feel unrepresented by the system, so they would rather let it fall to pieces and fight, if it comes to that.

    The difference is that you wish to win, following the rules of the game. They want to change the game. Perhaps your method will work, perhaps it won’t. But letting it escalate will definitely bring change. Perhaps it will be change they end up hating. Perhaps it’ll be what they want. Either way, things change. Implicit abuses of authority are hard to fight unless you have a solid bead on the issues. Explicit abuses of authority at least give you a target - and if things have gotten to the point of war, you can actually shoot at that target.

    In any case, rationality is often the enemy of action. A thousand people waiting until they have the definitively right direction end up doing little. A thousand people with a rough idea of what they want, and willing to take action, win, lose, or draw, will get things done.

    This relates to the whole “reality-based community” issue.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Their response is not irrational. They feel unrepresented by the system, so they would rather let it fall to pieces and fight, if it comes to that.

      Except I was feeling them out for what is their ultimate goal, and at no point did they say anything about the whole system falling apart. You are trying to rationalize their actions, but it is, frankly, just irrational. But even if it were “let the whole system fall apart” that’s also irrational because, chances are, it’s not them that is going to come out on top. It will continue to be people who currently have the power.

      The difference is that you wish to win, following the rules of the game. They want to change the game

      Not mutually exclusive. I understand the game I am playing, and play with those rules, and act rationally within those rules. I understand that you don’t change this by voting third party for president. I know that might feel good, like you are doing something, making your voice heard. But it’s just pissing in the wind. If one wants to change this, it comes from the floor up, and it’s something I do push locally as well.

      In any case, rationality is often the enemy of action. A thousand people waiting until they have the definitively right direction end up doing little.

      We do know the way forward, it’s working from the ground up. It’s getting our election system changed. No single president can change this, which is exactly why protesting the presidential election in this way is pointless.

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve already said what i have to say. …I doubt you’ve convinced them, but it’s good you have a passion and are pressing that direction. I understand that you think their take is irrational. I don’t think their take is irrational, though it’s not how I view things. Same as with yours.

        In any case, it’s good you have a passion for a way forward, and it sounds like you’re willing to pursue it. You’ll still have to accept the existence of those who don’t think like you, and who don’t agree with you, and wish to live their lives their own way. You either make room for them, or you fight them - and it seems like you have other, more important battles, which have a higher likelihood of success than trying to stop someone from thinking the way they do.

        Goodnight, and goodbye - say your final piece, and make it good for those who come after, since that’s your real audience. Above all, though, I hope life is interesting and enjoyable for you.

    • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Some of us are the people the other side wants dead. Taking the gamble on that change is literally risking our lives. I’d much rather a broken government that won’t oppress me to a functional one that will, and anyone who’d argue against that is arguing for betting my life on a positive change

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They are likely risking their own lives, too, whether or not they know it. But even of they are not, it is their prerogative to vote or not to vote, or to vote for whom they wish, regardless of your opinion, and even if that takes humanity in a direction that means we will have to fight for our freedom again. The cost of freedom has always been paid in blood. Force must be applied to those who attempt to force us, and only to the point that we are freed from their influence, lest we act as they do, and be bound by the consequences of making the same poor decisions.

        It’s weird watching the Democrats give the government additional powers, and watching the Republicans use those powers for power’s sake. And the Democrats seem shocked every time, and then when they have power, and the option to relinquish that power for both sides, they do not.

        We have not ceased and will not cease being in a world of tooth and claw, and of animal necessity. If you think you’re better than that, you’ll overreach, and get bitten. …and that’s the democrats and republicans - the overreach, and the bite, back and forth in different ways, ongoing, cycling like yin and yang until we have enough cultural experience to naturally do better - if we make it that far. …and that involves reaching across the aisle, and understanding your ‘enemy’ well enough that you ‘get’ it, on a visceral level.

        But, most people don’t do that, because, y’know. Filthy centrists that may as well be the other party, and all. Fortunately, being genuinely rooted in centrist concepts has benefits far beyond the political game.