• Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    6 months ago

    Get real man. Tik Tok was never about China. It was always about silencing support for Palestinians. This is known.

    Why do I feel like you’re the type to argue that fascist rhetoric is protected under the 1st amendment? If you think fascists deserve a platform, you are the bad guy. This is liberalism.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      It was always about silencing support for Palestinians

      This makes you look so uninformed it is literally causing me to cringe. The ban was proposed several years ago, by republicans originally.

      What the absolute fuck. When you say something so uninformed, it makes me think you actually are just mad about your funny videos and will look for anything else that sounds less pathetic to whine about

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          Motherfucker, Democrats got on board YEARS AGO because giving an authoritarian government full access to surveil your citizens is a fucking no brainer thing to want to prevent.

          All you’re doing here is revealing that you’ve no idea what’s been happening in the world. Probably due to endlessly scrolling through 15 second clips.

          Ps I will never click a TikTok link, even if it wasn’t clearly irrelevant

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Not as good as ignoring the history that happened in favor of simping for Chinese authoritarianism tho amirite

                  • LazyPhilosopher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I’ll bite stranger what history am I ignoring?

                    Do you mean to say by not taking the US government at their word for the reasons they gave for banning TikTok are true? I think it’s pretty dangerous to say that someone is denying history if they just think political actors are being less than honest.

                    If you mean something else, I’m all ears 👂

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It is known.

      Not unlike common sense. Commonly held, and very often wrong, because it just appeals to the prejudices and preconceptions of the person repeating it.

      Why do I feel like you’re the type to argue that fascist rhetoric is protected under the 1st amendment? If you think fascists deserve a platform, you are the bad guy. This is liberalism.

      Because it literally is. Whether you agree with that or not, the ACLU has gone to bat on the issue and established the issue several times in the highest courts of the land. If you’re arguing that Biden should be doing something he doesn’t have the power to do, I don’t know what to tell you.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        So let me get this straight… you hold (one specific reading of) the first amendment to be so sacred, that you’d sooner follow it and allow its dissolution by fascists, than deplatform the fascists who wish to dissolve it?

        You’d sacrifice your constitution and nation just so that you could have the moral benefit of having followed it?

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          So let me get this straight… you hold (one specific reading of) the first amendment to be so sacred, that you’d sooner follow it and allow its dissolution by fascists, than deplatform the fascists who wish to dissolve it?

          This is not the place or time for the argument of the question of how much power the government should have to decide what kind of politics count as unacceptably fascist. This is about Biden - Biden does not have the power nor political support to shut down Truth Social, so why the fuck bring it up?

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Because I haven’t won yet so I need to move the goalposts until I make the ball be inside it.”

          • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            So all of these obstacles that you list as reasons to why Biden is so ineffective - why didn’t he just nominate an AG who’d give him a free pass to do anything he wanted - like Trump? Why isn’t Biden bending the rule of law to halt fascism?

            The answer is because you cling to “precedence” and “civility” so hard that you’d rather see a fascist takeover before a democrat disobeys your precious rules and processes that were set up by 30 year old slave owners. To liberals, the rule of law takes precedence over a fascist takeover. It is bizarre.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s bizarre that the president isn’t a dictator, because otherwise a president who’s a dictator could be elected.

              That’s an interesting point of view.

                • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Dictators are those who exceed the normal constitutional boundaries of an elected office to impose their own will on a democratic system. Sorry that that’s too complex for you to understand.

                  • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    “Akshually sweaty, banning the leading fascist networking tool during a period of unprecedented fascism would make the president a dictator”

                    Good lord. Imagine being this lib. Even if Biden wins and we stave off fascism for 2024, it won’t be long until we fully backslide if this the height of liberal analysis. Utterly toothless.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t usually get out here like this, but you’re a fucking idiot if that’s how you see the situation.