Scientists have warned that a court decision to block the growing of the genetically modified (GM) crop Golden Rice in the Philippines could have catastrophic consequences. Tens of thousands of children could die in the wake of the ruling, they argue.

The Philippines had become the first country – in 2021 – to approve the commercial cultivation of Golden Rice, which was developed to combat vitamin A deficiency, a major cause of disability and death among children in many parts of the world.

But campaigns by Greenpeace and local farmers last month persuaded the country’s court of appeal to overturn that approval and to revoke this. The groups had argued that Golden Rice had not been shown to be safe and the claim was backed by the court, a decision that was hailed as “a monumental win” by Greenpeace.

Many scientists, however, say there is no evidence that Golden Rice is in any way dangerous. More to the point, they argue that it is a lifesaver.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is especially rational to question when looking at the GMO’s previous healthclaims like the safety of Roundup - Monsanto has had no qualms about lying to the public in the past.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        My trust has been eroded by this industry as a whole - I’m not saying their shit is dangerous but I won’t accept their claims on blind faith.

        It’s perfectly reasonable to demand a study in the name of public health.

        • Silverseren@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They have been working on and testing this golden rice since 2000, with tons of studies done on its biochemistry, including from people eating it. In fact, several countries have already been using the rice for years What else are the scientists supposed to do to appear Greenpeace’s purposefully vague demands?

            • Silverseren@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              To show what exactly? It’s actually really hard to get desired new traits to retain themselves in cross-breeding experiments and even in regular generational breeding. That’s the whole issue with F1 hybrid plants having great hybrid traits, but you can’t replant them or they completely lose those traits.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      But Roundup doesn’t have anything to do with GMOs? They made genes that let some plants tolerate a pesticide. The effects of that pesticide have nothing to do with the gene.

    • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Exactly. And those who suffer in the end is always the people, never the big corps. Never trust big corps to do the right thing in agriculture. They’ll fuck you over and leave the environment destroyed. Build local species.

      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Big corps” aren’t involved here. It’s a philanthropy project, and from what I can find it’s not legally encumbered in any way like Monsanto stuff is. This is entirely Greenpeace doing something that gets headlines, instead of something actually good. Don’t forget that that organization, too, has motives, first among which is going to be survival and advancement of the organization.

          • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            These companies provided access to the required technologies free of charge, for humanitarian purposes.

            They don’t own it, they don’t get paid for it.

            • Cypher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              The package contained proprietary technologies belonging not only to Syngenta but also to Bayer AG, Monsanto Co, Orynova BV, and Zeneca Mogen BV.

              The sentence preceding the one you have quoted. This is also only in respect to proprietary tech that was used in the creation of golden rice and not the proprietary golden rice itself.

              Regardless Syngenta has exclusive commercial rights to Golden Rice.

              Syngenta retains commercial rights

              So yes, I did read it, the whole article and several others. I understand the full picture and it isn’t as clear cut as some are making out.