Krafting@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 3 months agothe fear of missing out a better compressionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square190fedilinkarrow-up1928arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1919arrow-down1imagethe fear of missing out a better compressionlemmy.worldKrafting@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square190fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·3 months ago7z is available for Linux as well (CLI only) It is open-source too.
minus-squareyouRFate@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI know, but I’d say ppl on Linux tend to not use it.
minus-squarenexussapphire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·3 months agoWhen I was on windows I just used 7zip for everything. Multi core decompress is so much better than Microsoft’s slow single core nonsense from the 90s.
minus-squareBaroqueInMind@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down2·3 months agoSmall dick package kings/queens rise up.
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·3 months agoYeah, 7z is the clear winner.
minus-squaresparkle@lemm.eelinkfedilinkCymraegarrow-up1·edit-23 months agoIt’s much slower to decompress than DEFLATE ZIP though
Where .7z at
On windows.
7z is available for Linux as well (CLI only)
It is open-source too.
I know, but I’d say ppl on Linux tend to not use it.
.7z gang, represent
When I was on windows I just used 7zip for everything. Multi core decompress is so much better than Microsoft’s slow single core nonsense from the 90s.
Small
dickpackage kings/queens rise up.Yeah, 7z is the clear winner.
It’s much slower to decompress than DEFLATE ZIP though