• masquenox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    They’re providing/enabling the human right.

    You are literally saying that your human rights should be privately owned by somebody else. If that’s the case, why even bother with human rights?

    • Kissaki@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You gotta separate the concept of a right from fulfilling them.

      You can have a human right. But that alone does not answer how it is fulfilled.

      The right is not owned. It can’t be.