• Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    5 个月前

    Oh shit, was it that easy to fix climate change? To vandalize heritage sites was all it took?

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 个月前

        Well I’d argue it does nothing. In fact, it probably is counter productive, so instead of nothing it does the opposite

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 个月前

      Ah yes, it’s holding back the massive sweeping wave of change currently going on to fix climate change.

      No, don’t be a dumbass. It’s raising awareness, because it’s obvious nobody is giving a shit about this really fucking massive problem that is directly on our doorstep. Painting Stonehenge isn’t going to accomplish anything except be a nuisance, but being a nuisance is how you compel people to get shit done non-violently. MLK and his sit-ins pushed civil rights forward by being a nuisance. Gandhi pushed Britain out of India by being a nuisance. If you accept the status quo, the status quo will remain. You have to get out and make noise and attract a following if you want the folks in charge to pay attention to your existence.

      Trust me, you want them painting on Stonehenge for attention. This is the non-violent option. When this is ignored long enough, the non-violent option will be shelved and that’s when people will suddenly start paying attention.

      “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” - John F. Kennedy, 1962

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        You would accomplish much more by voting and getting two people under 30 years old to do the same.

        Also I missed the part of the civil rights movement where they blocked ambulances and threw paint on stone hedge.