Neil Gaiman — the best-selling author whose work includes comic book series *The Sandman *and the novels Good Omens and American Gods — has denied sexual assault allegations made against him by two women with whom he had relationships with at the time, Tortoise Media reports.

The allegations were made during Tortoise’s four-part podcast Master: the Allegations Against Neil Gaiman, which was released Wednesday. In it, the women allege “rough and degrading sex” with the author, which the women claim was not always consensual.

One of the women, a 23-year-old named Scarlett, worked as a nanny to his child.

  • Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have no idea if he’s a bad guy or wrongfully accused…but these two stories don’t sound convincing at all.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Two separate unrelated people.

      Both in their twenties

      Invites them into second/third base consensual relations and then it turns into rough sex.

      I think that it’s an absolutely reasonable assumption that he is into younger women and doesn’t stop after he gets the green light.

      But the article is light on details, and he at least deserves to have his say in court over it.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think that it’s an absolutely reasonable assumption that he is into younger women and doesn’t stop after he gets the green light.

        Why do you this is an absolutely reasonable assumption?

        Into younger women is pretty normal, but raping isn’t normal. Do you mean it’s a reasonable assumption given these accusations?

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The first three statements in my post support the fourth. Just because you don’t like my conclusion doesn’t make it unreasonable.

          From the light details in the article, here’s what’s not in question: He came on to his nanny. He came on to his fan. Two separate unrelated people. They are both half his age. They both have unsubstantiated but like stories.

          Now any of three things could be lies or deceptions or something else. That’s why if he has something to say he deserves to be heard.

          We don’t have any form of denial from his side. No claims of I don’t know these people or you don’t have all the facts. No statements of collusion. I would assume his lawyer said don’t say anything. Well this is fine and does not make him guilty it also doesn’t give us even the slightest indication that any of this is a fabrication.

          The next problem is when I say it’s reasonable that is my subjective opinion. If you know him and have a long personal knowledge of his history maybe you have a different opinion than me.

          Based on the information that’s brought forward substantiated and unsubstantiated I’m saying that this is a reasonable and likely direction that this will head. That is unless they settle out of court and what you won’t hear about it again.

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not who you replied to, and Gaiman may be innocent, but we should listen and find out. The “absolutely reasonable assumption” is probably based on his age and how he was raised.

          I don’t know how many men you dealt with that were raised with the mindset of “if she said yes once it means she says yes ALL THE TIME,” but some men feel that way. Hell a very famous and still popular movie has “Tell me more. Tell me more. Did she put up a fight?” In the opening of the movie. It seems kind of reasonable to me to assume being raised that “no” is something you have to “fight through” might mess with head.

          I’m not trying to justify any actually actions. I’m just saying I would listen to the victims before I dismiss the accusations just because I like the art he makes.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            One character saying something in a movie is not the equivalent of anyone being raised this guy. Also the existence of people like that doesn’t make it a reasonable assumption that this is how the guy thinks or behaves.

            • linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              FFS you’re just cherry picking your way through anything anyone says.

              Argue anyone’s whole comment in context or just go be a fanboy. You don’t really mind if you don’t like it but you’re retorts are weak.

      • Bell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        So your addition to the conversation is that we should not have a conversation. Got it

        • pageflight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          The contribution I read is: If you didn’t have specific evidence or context to add, then throwing in a ‘don’t trust women claiming SA’ is counterproductive. May not have been OP’s intent, but that’s what a vague distrust of the women’s stories sounds like.