Thousands of homes are under threat from a raging wildfire that erupted in northern California on Tuesday, as the state simmers in a brutal and potentially historic heatwave.

Roughly 28,000 residents have been forced to evacuate as the Thompson fire quickly swept across more than 3,500 acres (1,416 hectares) near the city of Oroville, about an hour outside Sacramento, California’s capital.

More than 1,400 fire personnel from across the state have deployed to battle the blaze, which was at 0% containment Wednesday afternoon. Eight injuries have been confirmed by officials, at least half of whom were firefighters, as dangerously high temperatures continue to threaten their health and safety.

“The combination of events has presented a huge challenge for firefighters,” he said, urging the public to take extra precautions to limit new fire starts that can quickly spread crews thin, especially as temperatures spike.

“It’s a tough thing to do,” he said. “You are asking people to hike up a mountain when it’s 108F (42.2C) outside.”

Temperatures in the state capital, Sacramento, were forecasted to reach between 105F and 115F (40.5C and 46.1C) – conditions that could last until Sunday.

“This is going to be a severe, prolonged, potentially record-breaking heatwave that may have large impacts for much of California,” said climate scientist Dr Daniel Swain during a broadcast discussion of the heat event on Monday. The long duration will only add to the potential impacts and intensity, especially because little relief can be expected even after the sun sets. “It just isn’t going to cool off – even at night,” Swain said.

  • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    What water are they going to use? NorCal is dry as a bone in the summer, and we won’t see rain or snow until late October (if we’re lucky).

      • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, I’m not saying that the beaver reintroduction isn’t going well; I live in an area in the NorCal mountains where I have 3 beaver dams within a mile of my house.

        I’m just saying that beavers aren’t really a good way to mitigate wildfire danger because they only help in areas that have year-round water flow, which is a tiny portion of the Northern California forests. As close as I am to beavers, I still can’t get wildfire coverage in my neighborhood, because the beavers only make an impact within about 15 yards of the river, and there just aren’t that many year-round rivers in NorCal (at least relative to the amount of forest land)

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Technically, they help where there isn’t year round flow by daming it and keeping it there longer…

          Like, this is a real thing with real studies.

          Surface level might only look like a small area, but that water seeps into the ground for much further.

          Which helps vegation, and that causes more water to be retained, being back new creeks and rivers that more beavers than dam.

          Like bro, the first beavers in 75 years were released last year in NorCal…

          Give em a minute

          • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Like bro, the first beavers in 75 years were released last year in NorCal…

            I think you misunderstood the headline. Beavers are not extinct in CA other than the one place in your article. I’m well aware of the impact of beavers on reintroducing and rehabilitating wetlands. I live on one of the rivers where beavers were reintroduced in the 1940’s. I literally work with ecologists and hydrologists that work on some of these projects.

            But guess what? That same river basin that has had beavers damming it for more than 75 years and has had a ton of work from the forestry service, CCC, and beavers had a massive wildfire two years ago. Reintroducing beavers is not enough to stop wildfires in California. There’s literally not enough water and streams compared to the area of forest.

            edit: but cool, just downvote and move on when shown to be wrong. Leave this to the people that have some knowledge of the issue