• hypnoton@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I am against Trump as much as you.

    But if we feel we must vote D “or else” how and why would the Democrats feel the need to offer meaningful reforms to their voters?

    If I am a Democrat politician and I depend on billionaire good will $$$, I know I don’t even need to promise much to my voters, I just need to be less tyrannical and less insane than my friends across the isle. Then my goal is to work the system enough to get reelected, and after a few election cycles revolving door myself into a $300k a year “do nothing” job that one of my billionaire backers will have lined up for me assuming I don’t displease him.

    The logic of this is inescapable. It means our only hope is for the Republicans to somehow become much more progressive so that the Dems actually need to work to compete.

    The only way for a progressive voter to escape this conundrum is to signal to the Democrats that the Dems do NOT have our votes on lock. And the only way to signal that is to vote our conscience no matter what, even if it’s scary.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I am against Trump as much as you.

      Bullshit; you’re concern trolling. That means there are only three possibilities, all of them bad:

      1. You’re too dumb to see this as the existential threat to democracy that it is, and that now is not the time for an ignorant-of-game-theory protest vote.

      2. You’re too privileged to care.

      3. You’re a pro-Trump shill doing it on purpose.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        One more - tankie accelerationist who thinks that there will be some mythical bloodless uprising or just outright doesn’t care that hundreds of millions would die in a collapse of the US.

        Which I guess fits as a mix of 1 & 2, with a sprinkling of tankie on top?

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      The logic of this is inescapable.

      The logic that is inescapable is that if the neofascist moviement captures America the only ‘meaningful reforms’ you’re going to get your whole life is a vast enshitfication project like 1930’s Germany.

        • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe. But is your alternative just to directly elect Hitler to the chancellorship and short circuit the process?

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            But is your alternative just to directly elect Hitler to the chancellorship and short circuit the process?

            Sure seems to me like that’s what these folks want.

          • hypnoton@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            How about we circle the wagons around a candidate who can mop the floor with Trump during a debate?

            That’s the absolute bare minimum.

            • rekorse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Did it occur to you that most people dont give a shit how they debated, just what they said? Biden won the debate from my perspective.

              Besides all that, debates just dont matter much overall.

              • hypnoton@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                You’re welcome to think that.

                You rep your interests. I rep mine.

                I saw two worthless sundowning capitalist losers at the debate. Trump is a liar and is also senile, just less so compared to Biden. Trump lies 3x more than Biden. But neither candidate offers an even remotely positive and inspiring vision for America. Biden’s vision is “nothing will fundamentally change, tweaks around the edges.” Fuck that!

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Local elections.

      No one is getting a 3rd party candidate in the Presidential office today. Full stop, totally ridiculous idea, an absolute waste of a vote. Yes, a waste. It’s a vote that will do nothing but help Trump win.

      Meaningful reforms don’t happen overnight, don’t happen with magical ghost candidates that don’t exist, or by “showing the Democrats you aren’t happy by voting against them”.

      Meaningful reforms take time. Look at marijuana legislation. Incredibly popular support for, at a bare minimum, medical uses. We are talking nearly 50 years of fighting at a federal level, but local compassionate use has been around since the 1970s, despite efforts at the federal level to constantly make all marijuana use criminal. By the 90s there were several states with compassionate use ballot initiatives (though it took until 2000 for a state to legalize it through the legislature - Hawaii).

      Despite democrats that were out there against use of cannabis for medical purposes, and the many, many, many Republican administrations who put up as many barriers as possible, we are now trending toward full legalization.

      Should everyone have just given up because only some supported legalization, even medical-only? And let it be banned outright?

      It’s the same with climate change legislation, it doesn’t have to be all at the federal level. And abortion access, protections for minorities, police reform, and so on, and so on.

      So let’s be clear about one thing. The choices this election are Trump and Biden. You’re not getting any others.

      You can vote for Biden with a chance for the future, or Trump where the platform explicitly goes against these concerns to the extreme, and outright going full throttle for fascism.

      You want to signal to the Democrats? The only signal you’ll be sending anyone is that fascism is A-OK, because you’re not getting another chance at democracy.

      So you send that signal locally. The other option is, for lack of any better way for me to phrase this right now, the absolute stupidest fucking idea I’ve ever heard.

      • hypnoton@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Never in history of America has a 3rd party candidate been elected president. There is not one 3rd party voter, not one, who does not know this. Whoever votes 3rd party in a presidential election thinking a 3rd party candidate will win?

        No one does that. I never argued for that, for a 3rd party win. I was very clear about the purpose of voting 3rd party in a presidential or Kingly (as the case may be this year) election. I won’t repeat myself. You are an adult and you can read.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          So you’re agreeing that the message you’re sending is that you’re totally cool with fascism and an effective end to the legitimacy of elections.

          Noted and thanks for the confirmation.

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Easy. Actively, vigorously, constantly primary Democrats with solid, left leaning candidates. But show solidarity in the general. At first they accidentally lose a few seats. But it’s okay because those that won still caucus and work with them. Eventually the “others” start to become sizeable. And they’ll think to themselves perhaps we should work with them more to get things done. Eventually they become us. It’s realistic, and 1000% more effective than protest votes they’ll continue to ignore.

      • hypnoton@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The DNC completely controls every aspect of the primary process. The DNC is a private corporation, not a democracy.

        The DNC is completely regulated by the billionaires.

        The DNC is not obliged to even have primaries. Nor is the DNC committed to any kind of fairness and openness. In other words the DNC is not committed to democracy but only uses some democracy whenever they think it will suit the DNC’s objectives.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Who cares?

          Locally, I have third party candidates that have made it to various offices. Do you think a new federal level party just magically appears?

          Seriously, what part of this do you not understand? Because I don’t think you’re jumping to wild conclusions here, I think you’re achieving teleportation levels here.

          The DNC does not matter.

          You have TWO choices for president. Full stop, no discussion, that’s reality.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I never implied otherwise. You are arguing a straw man and not against what was said.

          The DNC is not completely regulated by billionaires. But the wealthy and Powerful have always had an outsized voice throughout human history. It shouldn’t be that way but it is. The way to change it is not to screen that they should pay attention to someone like yourself who has no wealth power or control. But to come for them and win. They can close their primaries if they want it will only hurt them. Because we don’t have to run it then we just have to work together to actually get s*** done.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          The DNC completely controls every aspect of the primary process.

          Yes they do. Through this charter.

          https://democrats.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/DNC-Charter-Bylaws-03.12.2022.pdf

          Nor is the DNC committed to any kind of fairness and openness.

          Article 2: Section 4. The National Convention shall…(b) assure that delegations fairly reflect the division of preferences expressed by those who participate in the Presidential nominating process,

          Section 4. The National Chairperson shall serve full time and shall receive such compensation as may be determined by agreement between the Chairperson and the Democratic National Committee. In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.

          Section 12. All meetings of the Democratic National Committee, the Executive Committee, and all other official Party committees, commissions and bodies shall be open to the public, and votes shall not be taken by secret ballot or use of the unit rule

          The DNC is completely regulated by the billionaires.

          Regulations require laws or charters. The elected delegates to the national convention elect the membership of the DNC as well as the nominee. That would be the same nominee who as president raised taxes on corporations despite having a razor this senate majority to work with including 2 who later became independents. Weird that the billionaires forced the DNC to adopt principles that taxation should “clearly be based on ability to pay”.

          Section 17. Democratic Party Credo.

          We believe it is the responsibility of government to help us achieve…a society where taxes are clearly based on ability to pay;