• Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    tehre is no reason to believe non-human animals can participate in an ethical society, so there is no reason to include them in our ethical systems.

    But we do. You mentioned how you ought not to kick a dog, for instance. The difference is that we treat some animals as companions while treating others as resources for exploitation. If you truly believe that there is no reason to be ethical to animals, why not kick that dog? Or maybe boil it alive?

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      why not kick that dog?

      again, kant discourages cruelty as a practice toward non-human animals, as it may lead to practicing cruelty toward people. that’s it. it’s not including them in our morality.

        • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          practicing cruelty is bad, but animal agriculture is not cruelty in and of itself. if a particular operation is acting cruelly, they should be admonished.

          • Emerald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            animal agriculture is not cruelty in and of itself. if a particular operation is acting cruelly, they should be admonished.

            I would argue that animal agriculture is cruelty in and of itself. It’s forcing animals into small cages, forcibly impregnating them, stealing their babies, cutting off their tails, and then painfully murdering them. It’s a cruel operation