Everyone in the world knows that Jill Stein fully supports Russia. It’s been known since 2016, that was the point. Hence why I initially said I was going to write in a candidate…
You claimed my choice to write in was invalid, and I should be able to find a candidate that is anti-genocide.
I gave you the only option on my ballot against the Israeli genocide, we both agreed that Jill Steins support for Russias genocide also disqualifies her.
So this leaves the only option as write-in, right?
I’m not surprised you didn’t know that.
Everyone in the world knows that Jill Stein fully supports Russia. It’s been known since 2016, that was the point. Hence why I initially said I was going to write in a candidate…
You claimed my choice to write in was invalid, and I should be able to find a candidate that is anti-genocide.
I gave you the only option on my ballot against the Israeli genocide, we both agreed that Jill Steins support for Russias genocide also disqualifies her.
So this leaves the only option as write-in, right?
I didn’t claim that, the constitution says it is.
The Constitution does not disallow write in votes. I think you’re confused.
I’m not confused.
Okay, so where in the Constitution does it prohibit write in votes?
The constitution spells out what someone needs to qualify as a presidential candidate.
No one but you is talking about prohibiting write in votes.
I think you might be confused.
Yes, it does not prohibit you from writing in a candidate, even if they don’t qualify for holding office, you can write in whoever you like.
Hmm,
Earlier
I think you’ve talked yourself in circles so much you have no idea what point you were ever trying to make.
You’re making the point that Jill Stein is against genocide and you’re calling me confused?