• SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You (the pro-genocide one)

    You claimed my choice to write in was invalid

    Me (the harm reduction person)

    I didn’t claim that, the constitution says it is.

    I literally can’t make it any clearer then this so why I I engage in your accusation when you clearly are having troubles understanding a very basic fact?

    • Antmz22@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Are you going to stop me from writing them in or something? Lol (me)

      I can vote for anyone I want, they just can’t win and hold office. (Me)

      I’m not going to stop you but the constitution will. (You)

      Yes, you can’t make it any clearer, you believe that the constitution would stop me from writing in a candidate who I know can’t win (due to Constitutional limits on who can hold office).

      That’s explicitly what you said, the constitution would stop me from voting write in.

      Idk why you’re engaging in anything, you are doing.

      Is it fun to spread lies about anti-genocide freedom fighters because someone refuses to vote for your candidate who is carrying out the genocide he’s fighting against?

      Are you that despicable of a person?

      You can claim harm reduction all you want, while you vote for the contiued genocide of Palestinians and spread lies about their people. You will be forced to answer for it on one great day.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know why you’re getting angry because you’re unable to research people so you end up being straight up pro-genocide.