Seems to me that there might have been a better way to handle this.

  • stembolts@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    I disagree. Setting aside my feelings on the policy, a behavior occurred, a policy was enacted, a behavior was changed. Making it objectively a policy issue.

    Your desire for it not to be a policy issue seems to be the driving factor for why you don’t think it’s a policy issue. Seems like circular reasoning.

    Maybe I’m missing something though, I’m open to elaboration on why curtailing misbehavior on public grounds with a policy is not a policy issue.