Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agoMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square459fedilinkarrow-up1582arrow-down1101
arrow-up1481arrow-down1imageMaybe this is better for everyonelocklemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square459fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month ago What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.” Which is factually supported by the study …for a limited segment of the population.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoIt’s actually not speaking about the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet. As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.
…for a limited segment of the population.
It’s actually not speaking about the personal costs born by consumers, it’s talking about the cost of purchasing food for the diet.
As I said, if the paper was discussing the systemic hurtles and personal choices of consumers it would be a different paper, saying a different thing.