• asbestos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You speak about the US but it fucked the sky up for the entire planet, for all of us.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      That’s the main issue I see here, too. If you can provide this without the side effect, per-country, sure. Go ahead. Cool service.

    • survirtual@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Fucked up the sky for all of us? Who is “all of us”? Most of “us” live in mega cities with so much light pollution it blots out the night sky. Everyone in these horrid concrete jungles has high speed internet and absolutely no connection to the stars. Many of these people have never even seen the stars.

      The ones living outside of these cities are the minority, and now they have internet. An internet they have been promised to the tune of countless billions for a very long time. They see the stars every night. Starlink has not impacted their connection with the stars at all.

      So I am genuinely curious. Who, exactly, is the “us” you refer to?

      And why are you not rallying against the light pollution that has denied billions access to the stars for at least generations?

      • asbestos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 minutes ago

        What I meant was everybody who has access to the sky. If you live in the city, you can travel a relatively short distance from it to see the sky, but you can’t avoid starlink satellites no matter where you are.
        Mainly, I meant us who go out at night with their telescopes and adapters for DSLR cameras to take stacked long exposures of all the cool things we can see from our pale blue dot.

        The lights you refer to are millions of different municipalities ordering street lights designed with zero consideration for the light pollution they might produce. It’s a huge problem with no easy fix on a global level while starlink is literally just one company launching a shitload of satellites. What exactly makes you believe I’m not “rallying” against light pollution?
        And yes, I’m aware our space pollution is already insane but people wouldn’t complain this much if starlinks didn’t travel at a much closer distance to us (and thus and block more view) and if they weren’t launched in such huge numbers in a short amount of time.
        Now that I think about it, what the fuck are you even saying? That this is good and we should launch more starlink satellites? That the situation is already that bad that we shoudn’t give a shit?