• Hazmatastic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      “If you or a loved one have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you may be entitled to compensation…”

    • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seriously, except for the horrific issues with the stuff, it would be an essential material for various applications.

      Its resistance to fire, heat transfer, etc would do wonders for insulation and construction.

      • degen@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        2 days ago

        Makes me wonder if it could be treated in some way to make it not-so-inhalable. Though maybe we have better synthetic alternatives by now.

        • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          53
          ·
          2 days ago

          As I’ve understood it, the problem is primarily for the people having to manufacture products using it, and at rest it’s supposed to be inert.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Don’t forget about when it’s time to un-make it.

            Tearing down old building or tiles containing asbestos is also a huge issue.

            • psud@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              So many people were exposed to asbestos dust in New York when the world trade centre towers were destroyed by terrorists

              • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                29
                ·
                edit-2
                24 hours ago

                lol terrorists. I see them as victims in a war this country started. So by proxy, we’re the terrorists. What a stupid fucking word!

                • psud@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  I’m calling them by their methods not their politics

                  One is a terrorist when one attempts to alter a country by attacks attempting to terrorise the population

                  You do recall that they destroyed office buildings with airliners

                  • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    18
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    I was alive to experience that yes. I’m willing to concede we’re all terrorists further emphasizing the ridiculousness of the word. And thanks for patronizing me! Do you recall what we had done to them in their countries?

          • witty_username@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            51
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Except that people don’t always recognize it and end up drilling holes in it or sawing through it

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doesn’t burn, really hard to wear out, you can just dig it out of the ground, easy to shape and repair.

      Except it kills people, and it hurts the whole time they’re dying.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          The universe owes none of us anything. We stick our noses into everything and some things aren’t good for us

          This one is only really bad because the asbestos companies kept it secret when they found their product killed those exposed to it.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lead in gasoline was a stop-gap solution. If I remember correctly , it was added because we didn’t have the technology at the time to refine gas sufficiently to get the octane levels necessary to prevent pre-ignition of fuel (which causes rod knock) at a reasonable cost. Tetraethyl lead effectively increased the octane level/resistance to pre-ignition. As a side benefit, the lead slightly lubricated the valves and valve seats so that they lasted for tens of thousands of miles, instead of needing to be reground every few thousand miles.

        It was a stupid stop-gap though, esp. since the dangers of lead were well known by then.

        • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re mostly correct. It was an additive to raise the octane rating and did lubricate. However, it wasn’t a gas refinement issue that caused the need. An octane boosting additive has been needed ever since, right up to today. Now the octane booster used is ethanol, mostly.

          Race cars and many airplanes still use lead. We’re still making people dumber. Just at a lesser scale.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You can absolutely get high octane ethanol-free gas; there’s a place near me that sells it. I know that a lot of people with motorcycles use it, because inline four cylinder motorcycle engines tend to be high compression, and motorcycle people tend to be almost religious about not using ethanol. (Which is unnecessary; assuming your motorcycle is fuel injected, the only risk with ethanol is storage for several months at a time with a full tank of gas. If you do that, then you’re going to end up with water in your gas, because ethanol is hygroscopic. As long as you keep riding regularly, or empty your tank and run the motor dry before storing it for more than a month, you’ll be fine with ethanol in your gas.) I know of at least once place near-ish to me that sells 110 octane ethanol- and lead-free racing gas. Ethanol-free high octane fuels tend to be about 25-50% more expensive than fuels with ethanol.

            Avgas is another story. The odds are pretty good from what I can tell that any prop airplane is going to need gas with tetraethyl lead. To me, that sounds like a good reason to remove them all from service in favor of jets, but I think that jets have a higher stall speed, which can be a problem, esp. in backwoods areas.

            (Jet-a and jet-a1 are kerosene derivatives, and don’t have lead.)

            • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Ethanol free gas doesn’t mean there aren’t any no knock additives. There’s several more things besides Ethanol that can be added to gasoline that will increase the octane. Strictly speaking, “gasoline” isn’t even one exact formulation.

              Short of it is that ethanol free gas just means it’s using something else to boost the octane.

          • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            If you want a sad rabbithole, look at the cancer rates around small airports, which are often much closer to where people live.

            • 667@lemmy.radio
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              While it’s no consolation to these current people, they are trying to make the switch to lead-free aviation fuel. It’s partly a regulatory nightmare, and partly a genuine safety challenge; mandating a fuel change in aviation without adequate research and understanding can result in unexpected engine malfunctions.

              • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                unexpected engine malfunctions

                On the other side of that is the known problems that lead causes. Seems to me that the best solution is to give everyone a cut off point, and say, hey, when we hit this point, you’re going to have to retire that engine, and get one that’s known to be good with lead-free avgas. Sure, it’s a cost, but that’s why you give people time to prepare.