• faltryka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    All it takes is reading the article to see why it was done. You clearly did not do that and instead inserted your own agenda.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      I did read the article and drew the conclusion I just stated. Feel free to offer your own take.

      • faltryka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        While he certainly wasn’t sensitive about how he said it, he did state is was sanctions related.

        • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 months ago

          He was not clear on that at all. For all we know it could be an excuse among the several vague ones he gave or a reference to pressure from Feds.

          • faltryka@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            And FYI for the actual innocent bystanders who aren’t troll farm accounts - the “various compliance requirements” are not just a US thing.

            If you haven’t heard of Russian sanctions yet, you should try to read the news some day. And by “news”, I don’t mean Russian state-sponsored spam.

            • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              The “various comoliance requirements” are unstated. Everything here is being left to a vague implication.