• lightnegative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are you talking about? Plenty of laws discriminate based on age. Like, the minimum drinking age, the minimum voting age and the minimum age of consent

    • mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This doesn’t discriminate based on age. This creates a permant class of adults who may exercise a freedom and those who mayn’t.

        • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the only thing to compare itself to is basically itself. The NZ law that it is emulating is not even a year old, so it hasn’t exactly given any data on that in between generation that hasn’t yet been created. I’m not saying it won’t work, I’m just pointing out that this is the only really comparable law.

        • mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          New Zealand likely doesn’t have an equal protection clause in their legal system.