• Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    certainly not saying you’re wrong, but the base load problem is still a problem afaik… storage solves some of it, but i think storage isn’t a full solution - we’d still need some other 24/7 generation capacity

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Agreed; and it will become more of a problem as water becomes less predictable. Problem is, for most atomic generators, that also holds true.

      Investment in research is definitely needed, but building existing systems isn’t going to solve the issues either.

      • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        Thorium Salt reactors can recycle their water source and also use water from waste treatment or even sea water as they’re not high pressure water reactors.

        When you don’t need the result of power generation to be fissionable material for warheads there are a lot more options available to you, such as using the waste from older reactors to generate energy and output much less reactive material.

        Nuclear missiles are an albatross around the neck of nuclear power.