MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square383fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down1182
arrow-up1955arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square383fedilink
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32arrow-down8·2 days agoTBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.
minus-squarejaschen@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 days agoWhile 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoYes. Over the long term it will render the planet uninhabitable, or at least close enough to it.
minus-squarejaschen@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoSome experts would argue it’s already starting to be uninhabitable.
minus-squarePyr_Pressure@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·2 days agoWhy not build it in a remote location then? Dams can also produce a lot of hydroelectric power, and a catastrophic failure could also destroy an entire town or more. We just don’t build dams upstream of a large town.
minus-squareFonzie!@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agoThe Chernobyl reactor’s explosion had impacts all the way in West Europe. I don’t think you can be remote enough with this.
minus-squareOsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 days agoI think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·2 days agoYes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.
TBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.
While 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.
Yes. Over the long term it will render the planet uninhabitable, or at least close enough to it.
Some experts would argue it’s already starting to be uninhabitable.
Why not build it in a remote location then?
Dams can also produce a lot of hydroelectric power, and a catastrophic failure could also destroy an entire town or more. We just don’t build dams upstream of a large town.
The Chernobyl reactor’s explosion had impacts all the way in West Europe.
I don’t think you can be remote enough with this.
I think a town burning down would be fatal for most the inhabitants 3000 BC
Yes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.