not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 18 days agokicking feet rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1389arrow-down16
arrow-up1383arrow-down1external-linkkicking feet rulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareactiv8r@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·17 days agoI wonder if a good lawyer could argue that any jury that finds him guilty are, by definition, not his peers.
minus-squareWraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-217 days agoI don’t see that working even if the court system hadn’t evolved into an apparatus solely for the enforcement of class strata. His peers are the general public.
I wonder if a good lawyer could argue that any jury that finds him guilty are, by definition, not his peers.
I don’t see that working even if the court system hadn’t evolved into an apparatus solely for the enforcement of class strata. His peers are the general public.