I hate how “anti-war” has been hijacked by these people to mean, let imperialist countries invade whoever they want with no consequences. (in the case of tankies, any imperialist country that isn’t in NATO).

  • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    What makes you say they don’t think it applies to the West? I don’t follow your logic there.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Because if you tell them China is just as capitalist as the West, they tell you it absolutely isn’t and is a communist country.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        Ok but China is absolutely not as capitalist as the west, and that’s an insane thing to say.

      • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’d buy that line if China wasn’t integrating those large businesses (albeit slowly) into the public sector, something the west is not doing, but rather moving to deregulate more and more (Thanks Trump! /s)

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          And yet it’s still not a communist country. I get that you want it to be a communist country, but it isn’t.

          • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            12 days ago

            You won’t see me argue that China is communist, it’s socialist as it stands now with the stated goal of becoming communist

              • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                12 days ago

                In industries that have been pulled into the public fold, sure. I’m calling them socialist In the same vein that you might still call most western countries capitalist despite having market regulations and some companies that are workers co-ops or use other socially owned frameworks. As long as they’re solidly on this trajectory it seems silly to me to label it otherwise at this point just as it would be silly to call the us socialist for having a few employee owned businesses

                  • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 days ago

                    I’ll not directly list any because that would be a waste of both of our times (notably some directly listed in the forthcoming article), but here’s a wikipedia article with some information about that. I’m picking wiki here because I have a feeling you won’t immediately discard it as pro-china propaganda. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-owned_enterprises_of_China

                    If the workers own the state and the state owns the corporations, what practical difference does it make? In a sense: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_socialism

                    The logic here is the state apparently operates at the will of the people (high approval ratings and high participation) and is working to bring “common prosperity” by gaining more control over the privately owned economy and bringing io state (public) ownership