MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-211 days agoMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayexternal-linkmessage-square163fedilinkarrow-up1943arrow-down119
arrow-up1924arrow-down1external-linkMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-211 days agomessage-square163fedilink
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·11 days agoIt works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
minus-squareKitathalla@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·11 days agoSlight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
minus-squareevergreen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 days agoCorrect. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
minus-squareFridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·10 days agoWell, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol
It works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
Well, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol