Mod Visigoth_860@lemmy.cafe posted a really creepy and pro-pedophilia post at https://lemmy.cafe/post/11105990

Mod immediately bans the two people that call it out as trolls.

Update: post is locked after two more bans

  • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    From you

    wild hypocrites

    From wiki

    Tu quoque (/tjuːˈkwoʊkwiː/;[1] Latin for ‘you also’) is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent’s argument by attacking the opponent’s own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, so that the opponent appears hypocritical.

    You’re doing exactly that. Nobody is talking about whatever else you’re thinking about and it’s irrelevant.

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m talking about what ogmios was alluding to without ever coming out and saying. It’s a pretty common tactic with transphobes to equate supporting trans kids with letting children make adult decisions. Their “logic” is “if a fourteen year old can’t decide to fuck an adult they can’t possibly be responsible for knowing their gender doesn’t match what they were assigned at birth.”

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ah I see it now, the implication they made is disgusting and transphobic, and also is incredibly off-topic since these weren’t issues that were being brought up here, as in their comment was transphobic and off-topic.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m not trying to discredit you though. I’m asking you to extend your reasonable assessment of this situation to other situations which people around here remain wilfully blind too.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m sorry if you can’t see why there’s a connection between this guy arguing for exposing children to sexuality and the exposure of children to sexuality elsewhere, but a reasonable person should be able too.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Maybe I’m just dumb as fuck but what are you talking about?

            You seem to be referencing a different issue but you never say what the issue is. People are downvoting you a lot so I guess other people know what you’re referring to but I have no idea.

            Why be so vague?

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            exposing children to sexuality

            WTF is this supposed to mean?

            Nobody is stopping kids from fucking each other

            • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              I think maybe they are one of those people who equates transgender hormone treatment and/or sex ed that includes information on homosexuality to sexual abuse, not sure what else this vagueposting would be about

              • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                It would seem they are most likely one of those TERF assholes who are anti-sex-ed and also violently against trans affirming care.