• zephyreks@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    vuosi sitten

    Read your favourite general’s statement and get back to me. It’s simple English.

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        vuosi sitten

        Yes, and what exactly do you think that means?

        Also, props to Lemmy for handling this discussion, because the latency is way less than Reddit.

        • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          vuosi sitten

          @zephyreks That means it wasn’t able to collect data in part because of the countermeasures that contributed to preventing it from collecting data. If that was not the case, why wouldn’t the BG have just said, “no it wouldn’t have mattered because it wasn’t trying to collect data.”?

          • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            vuosi sitten

            Because they needed to justify the hassle and spending they spent trying to prevent it from collecting? Do you think the US military budget grows on trees?

            • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              vuosi sitten

              @zephyreks lol I can’t imagine the mental gymnastics you have to jump through to arrive at your worldview. For you to think that in that moment, while being questioned by a reporter about a Chinese balloon and the collection of data that his immediate thought was I need to justify the budget… It’s just astounding.