misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agoFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square281fedilinkarrow-up1642arrow-down110cross-posted to: framework@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1632arrow-down1external-linkFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square281fedilinkcross-posted to: framework@lemmy.ml
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 days agoWell, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoFrom what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
minus-squareenumerator4829@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoBecause you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoI thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?
Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?