• Jannes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They allowed a company to discriminate against a gay customer for religious reasons, when they requested to make a website them. It’s important to note that the supposed customer never actually contacted the company, is not gay and had been married to a woman for about 20 years. So this was all based on a lie

      • bric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The court opinion wasn’t based on any specific customer, if you read the SCOTUS opinion the website designer didn’t even have a business designing websites, they were just challenging the law in case they decided to make a business that did.