• MHLoppy@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe I’m missing something, but why are they? If it’s public money where’s the profit (the reason everyone else lobbied for it) in doing minimum-possible-effort?

    • klu9@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They didn’t want to stump up the cash for the fines & other costs.

      But there was nothing progressive about the fines the city was racking up: San Francisco’s Supreme Court win negates proposed EPA penalties in the hundreds of millions of dollars and mandatory sewer system upgrades that would cost billions and billions.

    • RotSteinFinke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      In my experience, a lot of these politics are purely performative. Politicians get elected on the promise of ‘reducing regulations’ to ‘release the economy’, without any connection to reality. In office they than have to do something that looks like the thing they fought for. We’ve seen the same after Brexit. The ‘bad and idiotic’ EU regulations were dropped and untreated sewage was let into the sea.