• LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Give it away? No I suggested he SELL it to escape from all the corruption. Wipe his hands clean of everything.

      • MüThyme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        As everyone and their mother has already pointed out, someone will buy it to live in. But also, you know, refusing to take part in a corrupt and unjust system?

        • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          They will buy it, live in it, and another unit of housing stock is now unavailable. That will reduce general availability, and push up prices. If that tenant wasn’t such a self centred, selfish asshole, the owner would have kept renting it at a loss, and availability would still be there. This is a two sided story, and many landlords are in the same situation. They are not all these insane, evil, wealthy monsters the internet makes them out to be.

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            This isn’t a problem if the person that buys the property lives in it.

            You are just being dense on purpose to give a bad faith argument.

      • LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because the person who lives in the home would be the person who owns the home, thereby ending the cycle of landlord woes.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sell it, let their money be eaten by inflation in two years. Just because a rando on the internet calls them evil for renting out a house, because they themselves hate their landlord.