• KubrickFR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    On 27 June 2023, Nahel Merzouk, a 17-year-old French youth of North African descent, was shot and killed by the police in Nanterre, a suburb of Paris, France. The Police reported it as self-defence but was later contradicted by a video posted online in which the policeman is pretty clearly in the wrong and basically just shot Nahel who was trying to flee a road interpelation. This led to widespread protests and riots, some really peaceful and some extremly violent. Which is now giving the government excuses to block social media in order to prevent further protests.

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The video posted online does not make it look as cut and dry as you put it. The kid is clearly driving away and was warned multiple times.

      EDIT: guys, maybe respond to the point instead of downvoting. Or are we back to Reddit ways?

      2nd EDIT: People are misconstruing my comment as if I’m defending the cop. I’m not condoning the actions of the police officer. All I’m saying is that it’s easy to armchair pontificate about the correct moral action. But imagine from all sides: what if the kid runs over a child and kills that child as they are speeding away. Then what? Just think it through a little more. All I’m saying is it’s not so black and white and it’s really easy for us to keyboard warrior from our office chairs.

      • Mir@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        His friends said that his leg slipped because the cop kept hitting him with the butt of the gun. Nevertheless, running away is not a reason to shoot someone. It is cut and dry as he put it.

      • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The cop lied about the danger he was supposedly in. Which you can clearly see in the video.

        The kid drove away after allegedly getting hit with the hilt a few times and absolutely being held at gunpoint, with the other cop screaming at his colleague to shoot him. And as far as I am aware, driving away in this situation should not be punishable by death.

        I don’t condone the extreme shit that happened next with the riots and all, but it was an execution plain and simple. Both cops should get fired and go to jail for that.

        • TheFonz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          So if the kid had run over someone while driving away and killed them would that have been ok ? Or at what point do we draw the line?

          • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sinply put, you can’t judge someone on something they haven’t done yet or they could potentially do.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              True, but would you agree that past actions are predictors of possible future outcomes? Aren’t we always doing a risk assessment each time we perform an action? A 17 year old kid driving recklessly is not the same as a 40 year old driving to work, right? Can we agree on that at least?

              • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not necessarily no, and especially here, the kid had no previous issues with the police (he had no criminal record).
                He was definitely an idiot for driving recklessly (and without a license I believe), and being arrested by the police for that is fair.
                But then for some reason he got held at gunpoint by two angry and racist cops. I assume he got scared and tried to drive off (also a somewhat fair reaction especially coming from a teenager), then he got shot and killed. If he got away with it and ran over someone while fleeing, he also should have gotten served a prison sentence or similar, but definitely not death. As for the hypothetical 40 years old, he could get distracted one day and run over someone as well, and that doesn’t warrant death penalty either.

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I agree with your post here so have an upvote. I think I’m realizing Lemmy is the same clone of reddit where virtue signaling is more interesting than having a Convo. At least you tried so I appreciate that

              • riodoro1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                When the action you perform is pulling the trigger of a gun aimed at a human being you better be pretty fucking sure of your risk assessment.

                There was no immediate and unavoidable risk to that cop nor to anyone else. Even if the kid was on drugs and speeding for fun shooting at him is not an acceptable response.

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  There was no immediate and unavoidable risk to that cop nor to anyone else

                  Wow, thanks for your analysis, Lemmy expert on conflict resolution! I’ll be sure to ping you next time I need some clear and unbiased analysis of an obviously dangerous situation. Man, I wish I could be half as confident as you sound when dishing out an opinion.

                  Even if the kid was on drugs and speeding for fun shooting at him is not an acceptable response.

                  Are you saying drugged up drivers that are speeding in high pedestrian traffic areas pose no risk to anyone at all??? Am I reading your comment right???

                  Edit: this response was for u/riodoro1 but for some reason Sync won’t let me reply to them.

          • Jesterkun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So by your logic we should be able to shoot anyone driving a car because they could potentially hit someone and kill them. Nice. I’ll keep that in mind.

            • TheFonz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              So by your logic we should be able to shoot anyone driving a car because they could potentially hit someone and kill them

              My logic doesn’t entail shooting everyone that drives a car. My logic is saying that context matters. Should we allow all drivers in all situations to drive recklessly regardless of the outcomes? You know the answer is no, so why are you asking that question?

                • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Come on…what a bad faith reduction of my position. I can tell there is no interest in having a conversation, just virtue signaling

  • Unsmooth7439@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    A couple of things immediately come to mind:

    • Long standing protests against the retirement age being raised to 72 (someone correct me on this one, please)

    • Police fired into a car that would not comply with a traffic stop and killed the occupant (who, I believe was a minority person). Rioting has ensued as a result.

    • Mortalsub@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Retirement age in France raised to 72??? Hell no bro, there would be no France if that were the case. Retirement age is being raised from 62 to 64. Here’s a source : Source

    • delirium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Retirement age was raised to 64 here, but they also added new regulations and kind off point system where unless you were working since 18 you have to retire much later (around 68), but this protest is kind off died over months ago to be honest.

      And now protests are: 2 police man killed 17 y.o who happened to be brown and Muslim because they first threatened him and he refused to comply, then tried to speed off away, almost hitting a pedestrian on his way. Policeman guys happened to have right wing associated tattoos as well, and even though the killed boy was someone with many criminal offences, shooting at him was not justified.

      • Unsmooth7439@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the info and update. I couldn’t remember the actual age and wasn’t aware that the protests for this particular issue had died off.

  • Mickey7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I wanted to protest a police action that I thought was unjust I would do it peacefully so that others would consider my view and give it some thought. If I wanted to be sure to turn many off to my view I would engage in the destruction of property.

    • Mir@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I did not down vote you but if you’re wondering I think they are down voting because Lemmy has a save post functionality you could use, in case you didn’t know.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    frenchies aren’t happy unless they’re rioting - I think there’s something in the water there

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope you’re not an American.

      Because there literally is something in the water there and people still not rioting.

      • tallwookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        rioting changes little, you’d think the frenchies would have figured that out by now.