• DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Men sexually harass women who do those things in the workplace, and they still have to cook your food and wipe your bum when they get home

    • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, they do not. Women do not have to stay in abusive relationships. They can go to court and get a restraining order, a divorce, or sue their employer if they are harassed at the workplace. No one is forcing them to stay in these types of situations. If they chose to do so anyways, they have no one but themselves to blame.

      • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ah, the good old “systemic oppression doesn’t exist because free will”

        Next you’re gonna say women who are forced by the state to carry pregnancies to term can just choose not to raise their kids

            • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you’re saying it’s immoral to give up a child for adoption when you are unable to raise it, but it’s not immoral to abort it before it even has a chance to take its first breath?

              • DroneRights [it/its]@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re very confused. We’re talking about women who COULD raise a child while working a job, and would rather have a life of their own, but are bound by basic morality. You also seem to think a single celled organism with no nervous system is a child.

                • PepeLivesMatter@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, I am indeed confused. Are you saying that women who COULD raise a child but choose not to are acting immorally when they give their child up for adoption, but they are acting morally if they chose to abort their pregnancy instead?

                  Because it sounds like that’s what you are saying.