• MrSlicer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Freecad is pretty powerful, and fully functional now that they figured out their topological naming problem.

    • philpo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      God. I hatelove FreeCAD so much. As someone coming from the Autodesk/Fusion360 world it is so incredibly clunky and unrounded.

      And on the other side so incredibly powerful and flexible.

      Argh. Argh.

      I really have to figure it out better.

      • MrSlicer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s hard for me to bitch when it’s free. I am very grateful for their efforts. That being said the learning curve is steep. But I’d assume not as steep a openscad.

    • Stelus42@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They finally did it?? I was using the thunder-something fork for a while because of that, but I always prefer sticking with the base project if I can.

      • MrSlicer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s largely mitigated in the newest version. I also used that branch. I don’t know if maybe they folded that branch in to the main or what.

      • MrSlicer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Openscad is all text based. Freecad is more like conventional cad software like fusion 360. Honestly I don’t even know how people can use Openscad lol.