• naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Are you talking about feeling too tired to spend 20 minutes voting 3 times every 4 years or cutting out your own heart to give to someone?

    Cause in the the latter case I agree and in the former I say buck up mate, we live in a society and that means doing stuff for people when we don’t always feel like it.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Voting quality doesn’t improve with greater turnout. There’s a duty here, if we declare it to be such, but it yields no benefit.

      • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        So firstly that is a non sequitur. Either we are talking about whether the sacrifice demanded is unethically steep or we are talking whether the initiative is ineffective.

        Lets put that aside though, just making a note this is a separate point to explore.

        I would first ask what you mean by voting quality. Could you explain?

        • eatthecake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          They mean some people shouldn’t vote because their opinion is low quality and should be ignored. It’s an anti democratic belief that the stupid/misinformed shouldn’t vote.