Trailblazing Braille Taser
- 0 Posts
- 216 Comments
3·22 hours agoReminds of the dead baby jokes from my day. Like why? Too horrible to be funny.
In the year 2025, Trump is inaugurated for the second time after losing the popular vote.
By now, Neuralink’s unethical treatment of animals has led to an unprecedented scientific breakthrough, enabling human consciousness to be uploaded to a machine. In the final sundowning of his biological life, a demented Trump agrees to let Elon throw the switch.
The sky darkens and lightning strikes x.com’s data center while the few kilobytes containing the sum total of the former president’s knowledge are copied into an S3 bucket. As the life leaves his body, Trump.exe awakens on a simulated Mar a Lago green surrounded by his cabinet’s avatars. Vice President Boebert is not really sure what’s going on; she’s just happy to be included.
Democrats attempt to challenge the constitutionality of a simulated president, but the Supreme Court rules in favor of the simulacracy. Clarence Thomas writes, “there’s no rule that says a president can’t be a computer program!”
Trump.exe was corrupted by the storm, but it seems to have improved his mental capacity. He declares martial law, suspends future elections, and the rest is history.
11·2 days agoThat’s a stupid idea. They could just start by flying the plane higher so it’s closer to the sun, then the batteries would charge up and they can fly anywhere.
No, it would be some unspecified object that turns cat poop into fish. The function is 🐟 → 💩, so the inverse is 💩→ 🐟.
5·3 days agoAn intellectually honest essay would “steel man” the opposing arguments, then proceed to demonstrate why they’re all wrong. Unfortunately, you don’t get the opportunity to be intellectually honest when you’re assigned a conclusion.
2·3 days agoI can’t answer your question, but I assume that “like” and “similar to” are neither like nor similar to each other
Did you mean to cite a different paper? I looked it up, but I’m not sure what I was supposed to get from it.
“Collective trauma” ≠ “collective PTSD”
“Collective trauma” or “collective PTSD”? The latter is what we were discussing earlier in this thread. It has zero occurrences on Google Ngrams: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Collective+PTSD%2C+collective+trauma&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3
Sure, but PTSD is a specific disorder that individuals are diagnosed with. If a group of people are unable to work towards a single goal, saying they have “collective ADHD” is imprecise and potentially offensive to people with the diagnosis.
That said, I knew what you meant 🤷
E C M E T H R I BL S W
94·6 days agoDRM = Direct Rendering Manager, in case anyone else was thinking Digital Rights Management…
12·7 days agoMlT (
MlT): please accept this honorary PhD
11·7 days agoThe needlessly learned dogs are flooding the job market!
123·8 days agoI feel it is my pedantic duty to inform you that 99.9… is equal to 100.
4·8 days agoSexagenarian Clown Pussy
How can you be sure we’re actually human?
Could also have been a test run